|
|
Letters
This
section gives readers an opportunity to share comments or observations.
For the sake of brevity, please keep all letters to no more than 250
words. While robust exchanges are encouraged, character assassination
and profanity are not. The editor has the final word on submissions.
Don't Ask, Don't Tell...
The
repeal of "Don't Ask Don't Tell" would have an indelible
harm on the ability of the military to accomplish its mission. In
order to meet any mission, an organization has to have the necessary
manpower. Despite what is commonly asserted, allowing homosexuals
to openly serve would reduce, not increase, the number of Americans
willing to serve and would result in fewer service members staying
in.
Many individuals are not willing to serve with open homosexuals. I
myself was an officer in the Marine Corps and I would not have joined
if open homosexuals were allowed to serve. Many officers I served
with shared my position.
During boot camp or Officer Candidate School there is no privacy.
The only showers are group showers and everyone lives side by side
in bunk beds in squad bays with only two rooms -- the room where the
beds are and the bathroom. There routinely is group nudity while changing
and showering.
Service members have the right to go through training without worrying
about becoming sexual objects. Allowing homosexuals to openly serve
would cause those in training to wonder if they were becoming sexual
objects of the homosexuals' fantasies. This would harm the morale
of those who did choose to join and would damage efforts at creating
unit cohesion. This would also create a situation full of real and
perceived same sex sexual harassment.
The military already has its hands full dealing with opposite sex
sexual harassment; it doesn't need to further burden its strained
legal and equal opportunity recourses with same sex sexual harassment
cases.
Also the majority of the military is opposed to allowing homosexuals
to openly serve. If only a small percentage of those against repealing
DADT left the military it would more than offset the homosexuals who
would be allowed to stay in or those who would join. In a time when
we are fighting two wars, we cannot afford to change a policy that
has clearly allowed the military to accomplish its mission for one
which would jeopardize our military's ability to accomplish its mission.
Patrick Callahan,
Esq.
|
|

|